This trend is illustrated by the Greek statue known as the Old Market Woman (in fact it is a Roman copy of a Greek original). When the statue was first discovered in 1907 at the foot of the Capitoline hill, it was thought to be a woman hawking a pair of chickens and a basket of fruit or vegetables, held in her (missing) left arm. Her right arm (also missing) is perhaps holding out something else for sale.
She stoops with age (or else “her whole body is contorted as
by a sort of recoil from her vociferation,” as an early interpreter supposed),
her breasts are partially exposed by her loose garment, and her face shows the
signs of old age: “the weary eyes, the sunken cheeks, the deep lines about the
mouth, and the shriveled neck and breast all show a sculptor whose aim was to
perpetuate an unlovely everyday type precisely as he saw it.”
But what about woman’s costume, legs, and feet? “The costume is the same that we find on the
ideal statues of goddesses or women—a sleeveless chiton, or dress, clasped upon
the shoulder, and over this a large himation or mantle. The folds of these two
garments fall as gracefully as though they covered the form of a young girl,
and it is curious to observe that the limbs which they cover do not correspond
at all to the shrunken character of the upper part, but are full and well
rounded, as are also the prettily sandaled feet.” And around her head is a kerchief encircled
by an ivy wreath. The conclusion? “The occasion on which she is offering her
wares for sale is some Bacchic festival.”
So Robinson in 1909.
Since then other interpretations have been offered. Some think that the woman’s costume and ivy crown make
it unlikely that she is a market seller, despite the name by which the statue
is known. Instead, she may be “an aged
courtesan on her way to a festival of Dionysos, the god of wine,” while the
basket and chickens may be “dedicatory gifts to the god or simply her own
provisions for a long day of celebration.” So the website of the MMA, where the statue may be seen today.
Andrew Stewart agrees that she is a courtesan (her chiton is revealing and "diaphanous"), though one "fallen on hard times." But he argues
against a connection with Dionysus, who had no temple near the findspot. Instead, he conjectures that the statue was
dedicated to the agricultural goddess Ops.
Yet one is left wondering who would commission such a
dedicatory statue…
No author. “Two Kinds
of Realism.” The Classical Weekly 3.8 (1909) 63.
Robinson, E. “The Old
Market Woman.” The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 4.11 (1909) 201-206.
Stewart, A. Art in the Hellenistic World: An
Introduction (2015) 235.
- Christian McKittrick
No comments:
Post a Comment